BPB Appeal No. A1059

Summary:

• 330(1)(a)reconsider application for licence
• focussed on issues that differentiated AOP 2 from AOP 3
• the Appellant took responsibility for and was capable of carrying out the tasks required by the Competencies
• considered recent example of documentation carried out by the Appellant - concluded that required skills were demonstrated, repeatable and current
• considered the arrangement between the Appellant and the technical staff - evidence established that the Appellant had and could undertake contract administration and site observation to the required performance levels - lacked peer support and review
• met Competencies 1,2,3 and 4
• Registrar’s decision Reversed
• Licence issued