BPB appeal no. A1143

  • Appeal number: A1143
  • Region: Omitted
  • Licence class: Design 2
  • Decision date: 18 June 2013
  • Competencies: Competency 1 Met Competency 2 Met Competency 3 Met Competency 4 Met
  • Decision of Board: s335(3)(a) Registrars decision - Reversed

Download full report

PDF (66 KB)



  • 330(1)(a) reconsider application for licence
  • performance indicator 1.1.4 not adequately demonstrated
  • appellant needs to improve both his knowledge and use of adequate conditions of engagement in order to provide the necessary protection for both clients and designer
  • whilst the Appellant’s drawings had proven adequate for a Building Consent and for construction of complex buildings, the drafting standards were not as would reasonably be required of a designer now
  • the extent of detailing and specification was inadequate to establish a sound contract for construction by others
  • however this was offset as the Appellant was able to identify all the details necessary in a complex project and the Appellant’s in-depth construction knowledge and experience in building contracts
  • competencies met
  • Registrar’s decision reversed
  • licence issued