Past appeal decisions
Displaying 20 of 114 results
BPB appeal no. A1299
- LBP number: BP133112
- Region: Wellington
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 7 March 2018
- Summary: Appellant provided insufficient knowledge and understanding in several areas to satisfy the requirements of Competencies 1, 2 & 4 –Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1285
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 31 May 2017
- Summary: The appellant failed to provide evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient Performance Indicators to satisfy the requirements of Competencies 1, 2, 3 and 4 for a Carpentry licence.
BPB appeal no. A1282
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 1 May 2017
- Summary: The Appellant demonstrated a limited understanding of building procedures, and lacked a greater depth of technical knowledge with regard to Restricted Building Work. Appellant did not meet Carpentry Competencies (2 and 4). Registrar’s decision confirmed. Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1280
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 6 April 2017
- Summary: Appellant appeared before the Board and after a short period of giving evidence, abandoned his appeal. Appellant did not meet sufficient performance indicators to be licensed. Registrar’s decision confirmed. Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1281
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 6 April 2017
- Summary: Appellant did not meet enough performance indicators to obtain a Carpentry Licence. The Board did not consider, on the balance of probabilities, that sufficient evidence had been provided by the Appellant to satisfy the Board that the performance indicators for competencies 1 to 4 inclusive of a carpentry license had been met. Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1279
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2, Site 1
- Decision date: 1 March 2017
-
Summary:
The Board found that Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for a Design area of practice (AOP 2) License had been met and the Board allowed the appeal. Appellant issued a Design AOP 2 Licence. Registrar’s decision reversed – Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1268
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Brick and Blocklaying
- Decision date: 15 December 2016
- Summary: The Board found that the Appellant did not meet a sufficient number of the performance indicators for a Brick and Blocklaying Licence. The Appellant was unable to demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of the relevant technical information, e.g. New Zealand Standards and manufacturers’ technical information – Appellant did not meet Competency (2, 3 and 4) –Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1269
- Region: Wellington
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 10 August 2016
- Summary: The Board found that the Appellant did not meet a sufficient number of the performance indicators for a Carpentry Licence. The Appellant was unable to demonstrate sufficient understanding and awareness of the regulatory processes that relate to licensing – Appellant did not meet Competency (1) – Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1266
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 10 June 2016
- Summary: Appellant demonstrated that he had carried out a range of residential building work, but he was unable to satisfy the Board that he met a sufficient number of the Performance Indicators to be licenced – Appellant did not meet Competencies (1, 2, 3 and 4) – Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1267
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Site 1
- Decision date: 10 June 2016
- Summary: In his submission the Appellant was able to demonstrate that he met the requirements of Competencies 2, 3, 4, and 5 for a Site 1 Licence – Registrar’s decision Reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1263
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 5 April 2016
- Summary: Appellant had insufficient knowledge and understanding in several areas. The Board found the Appellant lacked a depth of understanding in the practical application of building – Appellant did not meet Competency (2, 3 and 4) – Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1262
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 30 March 2016
- Summary: At the appeal hearing, the Appellant outlined his work history, experience and qualifications for the Board. Appellant was able to demonstrate that he met the requirements of Competencies (3 and 4) – Registrar’s decision Reversed – Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1260
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Roofing
- Decision date: 21 December 2015
- Summary: Appellant’s passed experience coupled with evidence provided at the appeal hearing demonstrated that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies (2, 3 and 4) – Registrar’s decision Reversed – Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1259
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 15 December 2015
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate he met the required performance indicators for Competencies (2, 3 and 4) – Registrar’s decision Reversed – Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1223
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Site 2
- Decision date: 23 September 2014
- Summary: The appellant’s earlier experience, coupled with his qualifications and work experience within the construction industry was found to have met Competencies 2-5 and provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met the requirements to be licensed.