Past appeal decisions
Displaying 20 of 181 results
BPB appeal no. A1371
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Foundations
- Decision date: 8 August 2022
-
Summary:
Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 and 4 for the Foundations AoP 1 (concrete foundation walls and concrete slab-on-ground) Licence The Registrar’s decision for this license type is reversed - License issued.
However appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 and 4 for the Foundations (concrete or timber pile foundation) Licence.
BPB appeal no. A1368
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: External Plastering
- Decision date: 21 June 2022
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1,2,3,4 and 5 for an External Plastering Licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1367
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 11 April 2022
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1,2,3 and 4 for a Carpentry Licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1366
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 30 March 2022
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 and for the Design AOP 1 License. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - License issued.
BPB appeal no. A1364
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Roofing
- Decision date: 3 February 2022
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1,2,3 and 4 for a Roofing (Profiled metal roof and/or wall cladding) licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1361
- Region: Waikato
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 22 December 2021
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3, 4 and 5 for the Design (AOP 2) license. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1363
- Region: Northland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 22 December 2021
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for a Carpentry Licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - License issued.
BPB appeal no. A1359
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 21 December 2021
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1, 2, 3 and 4 for the Design (AoP 1) license. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1362
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 20 December 2021
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for the Design (AOP 1) license. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - License issued.
BPB appeal no. A1356
- Region: Wellington
- Licence class: Roofing
- Decision date: 30 November 2021
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1, 2, 3 and 4 for the Roofing (Profiled Metal Roof and/or Wall Cladding) license. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - License issued.
BPB appeal no. A1360
- Region: Northland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 22 October 2021
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for the Design (Area of Practice 1) license. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed – license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1351
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 15 February 2021
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for a Carpentry Licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1352
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 15 February 2021
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 and 4 for the Carpentry license. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1347
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Site 1
- Decision date: 10 December 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3, 4 and 5 for a Site AOP 1 license. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1350
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 7 December 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competency 5 for a Design License (AOP 2). The Registrar’s decision is reversed - License issued.
BPB appeal no. A1349
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 3 December 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1, 2 and 3 for a Design Licence (AOP 1). The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1348
- Region: Wellington
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 16 November 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1-4 for the Design (AOP 1) licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1346
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 16 November 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for a Design AOP 1 License. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1344
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 14 September 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3, and 4 for a Carpentry Licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - License issued.
BPB appeal no. A1342
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 8 July 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.