Past appeal decisions
Displaying 20 of 162 results
BPB appeal no. A1342
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 8 July 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1329
- Region: Bay of Plenty
- Licence class: Brick and Blocklaying
- Decision date: 15 May 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3, 4 and 5 for the Bricklaying and Blocklaying licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1343
- Region: Bay of Plenty
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 11 May 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1334
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 10 March 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2-4 for the Design (AOP 1) licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1333
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 10 March 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competency 4 for the Design (AOP 2) licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1332
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 10 March 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 4 and 5 for the Design (AOP 2) licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1325
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Roofing
- Decision date: 9 March 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competency 4 for the Roofing licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1324
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 5 March 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 and 4 for the Design Area of Practice 1 Licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1331
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 4 March 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2-4 for the Design (AOP1) licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1326
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Brick and Blocklaying
- Decision date: 7 February 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1-5 for the Bricklaying and Blocklaying (Veneer AOP) licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1327
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 3 February 2020
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 and 3 for the Design (AOP 1) licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1328
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 3 February 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 and 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1330
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 3 February 2020
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for the Design AOP 1 licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1323
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry, Site 1
- Decision date: 13 November 2019
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competency 4 for the Carpentry Licence or Competency 1 for Site (AOP 1) License. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1322
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Foundations
- Decision date: 29 October 2019
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competency 4 for the Foundations (Concrete foundation walls and concrete slab-on-ground) Licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1321
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 23 August 2019
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 and 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1319
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Foundations
- Decision date: 12 August 2019
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for the Foundations licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1318
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Site 2
- Decision date: 18 July 2019
-
Summary:
Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3, 4 and 5 for the Site AOP 2 licence. The Registrar’s decision for this licence type is reversed - Licence issued.
However appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 and 4 for the Carpentry licence.
BPB appeal no. A1317
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 7 June 2019
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1, 2, 3 and 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1316
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Site 1
- Decision date: 16 April 2019
-
Summary:
Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 and 5 for the Site (AOP 1) licence. The Registrar’s decision for this licence type is reversed - Licence issued.
However appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 and 5 for the Site (AOP 2) licence and Competency 4 for the Carpentry Licence.