Past appeal decisions
Displaying 20 of 217 results
BPB appeal no. A1396
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Roofing
- Decision date: 30 October 2023
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competency 4 for the Roofing Concrete or clay tile and Profiled metal roof and wall cladding licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1393
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Site 1
- Decision date: 30 October 2023
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3, 4 & 5 for the Site AOP1 licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1394
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 27 September 2023
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 & 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1390
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Site 3
- Decision date: 21 September 2023
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3, 4 & 5 for the Site AOP3 licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1392
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Site 3
- Decision date: 19 September 2023
-
Summary:
Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3, 4 & 5 for the Site AOP3 licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1387
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 3 August 2023
-
Summary:
Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2,3 and 4 for a Carpentry Licence.
The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1386
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 3
- Decision date: 3 August 2023
-
Summary:
Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competency 5 for the Design AoP 3 Licence.
The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1385
- Region: Bay of Plenty
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 1 August 2023
-
Summary:
Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 and 3 for the Design AoP 1 Licence.
The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1376
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 2 June 2023
-
Summary:
s335(3)(a) Registrars decision – Reversed Summary
Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competency 4 for the Design AoP 2 licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1379
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry, Site 2
- Decision date: 10 May 2023
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence and Competencies 2, 3, 4 & 5 for the Site AoP 2 licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licences denied.
BPB appeal no. A1378
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 10 May 2023
-
Summary:
Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 4 for the Design AoP 2 licence.
The Registrar’s decision is confirmed – licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1375
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 7 March 2023
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1,2,3 & 4 for the Design AoP 1 Licence. The Registrar’s decision for this license type is reversed – Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1372
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 25 November 2022
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1,2,3,4 & 5 for the Design AOP 2 Licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1374
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Site 2
- Decision date: 22 November 2022
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3,4 & 5 for the Site AOP 2 Licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1373
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Site 3
- Decision date: 27 September 2022
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3, 4 and 5 for the Site AoP 3 licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1370
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 16 August 2022
- Summary: The Board has decided that it will refer the matter back to the Registrar for reconsideration and that it will issue directions as to how the reconsideration is to be carried out.
BPB appeal no. A1371
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Foundations
- Decision date: 8 August 2022
-
Summary:
Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 and 4 for the Foundations AoP 1 (concrete foundation walls and concrete slab-on-ground) Licence The Registrar’s decision for this license type is reversed - License issued.
However appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 and 4 for the Foundations (concrete or timber pile foundation) Licence.
BPB appeal no. A1368
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: External Plastering
- Decision date: 21 June 2022
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1,2,3,4 and 5 for an External Plastering Licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1367
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 11 April 2022
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1,2,3 and 4 for a Carpentry Licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - license denied.
BPB appeal no. A1366
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 30 March 2022
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that they met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 and for the Design AOP 1 License. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - License issued.