Past appeal decisions
Displaying 20 of 170 results
BPB appeal no. A1303
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Carpentry, Site 2
- Decision date: 22 March 2018
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3, 4 & 5 for the Site 2 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1299
- Region: Wellington
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 7 March 2018
- Summary: Appellant provided insufficient knowledge and understanding in several areas to satisfy the requirements of Competencies 1, 2 & 4 –Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1301
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 21 February 2018
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 & 5 for the Design 2 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1302
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 1 February 2018
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1298
- Region: Northland
- Licence class: External Plastering
- Decision date: 1 February 2018
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 & 4 for the External Plastering licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1300
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry, Site 1
- Decision date: 29 January 2018
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence and Competencies 3 4 & 5 for the Site 1 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1297
- Region: Northland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 5 January 2018
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 2 4 & 5 for the Design 2 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1295
- Region: Wellington
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 17 November 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1296
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 6 November 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1294
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Site 2
- Decision date: 17 October 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 4 & 5 for the Site 2 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1290
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 5 October 2017
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 4 & 5 for the Design 2 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1293
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: External Plastering
- Decision date: 5 October 2017
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 2 3 4 & 5 for the External Plastering PPCS licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1292
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 2 October 2017
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 2 3 4 & 5 for the Design AOP 2 licence. However the Board considered the Appellant met Competencies 1 2 3 4 & 5 for the Design AOP 1 Licence. The Registrar’s decision is modified – Design AOP 1 Licence granted.
BPB appeal no. A1288
- Region: Northland
- Licence class: Roofing
- Decision date: 15 September 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 2 3 & 4 for the Roofing licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1289
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 23 August 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1287
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 17 August 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 2 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1286
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Site 1
- Decision date: 10 July 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 4 & 5 for the Site 1 AOP licence based on his submissions. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1283
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 3 July 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 & 4 for the Design 2 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1285
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 31 May 2017
- Summary: The appellant failed to provide evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient Performance Indicators to satisfy the requirements of Competencies 1, 2, 3 and 4 for a Carpentry licence.