Past appeal decisions
Displaying 20 of 162 results
BPB appeal no. A1296
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 6 November 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1294
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Site 2
- Decision date: 17 October 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 4 & 5 for the Site 2 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1290
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 5 October 2017
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 3 4 & 5 for the Design 2 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1293
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: External Plastering
- Decision date: 5 October 2017
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 2 3 4 & 5 for the External Plastering PPCS licence. The Registrar’s decision is confirmed - Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1292
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 1
- Decision date: 2 October 2017
- Summary: Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 2 3 4 & 5 for the Design AOP 2 licence. However the Board considered the Appellant met Competencies 1 2 3 4 & 5 for the Design AOP 1 Licence. The Registrar’s decision is modified – Design AOP 1 Licence granted.
BPB appeal no. A1288
- Region: Northland
- Licence class: Roofing
- Decision date: 15 September 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 2 3 & 4 for the Roofing licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1289
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 23 August 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1287
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 17 August 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 1 2 3 & 4 for the Carpentry licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1286
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Site 1
- Decision date: 10 July 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 4 & 5 for the Site 1 AOP licence based on his submissions. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1283
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2
- Decision date: 3 July 2017
- Summary: Appellant provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient performance indicators to be considered to meet the requirements of Competencies 2, 3 & 4 for the Design 2 AOP licence. The Registrar’s decision is reversed - Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1285
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 31 May 2017
- Summary: The appellant failed to provide evidence to demonstrate that he met sufficient Performance Indicators to satisfy the requirements of Competencies 1, 2, 3 and 4 for a Carpentry licence.
BPB appeal no. A1282
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 1 May 2017
- Summary: The Appellant demonstrated a limited understanding of building procedures, and lacked a greater depth of technical knowledge with regard to Restricted Building Work. Appellant did not meet Carpentry Competencies (2 and 4). Registrar’s decision confirmed. Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1280
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 6 April 2017
- Summary: Appellant appeared before the Board and after a short period of giving evidence, abandoned his appeal. Appellant did not meet sufficient performance indicators to be licensed. Registrar’s decision confirmed. Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1281
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 6 April 2017
- Summary: Appellant did not meet enough performance indicators to obtain a Carpentry Licence. The Board did not consider, on the balance of probabilities, that sufficient evidence had been provided by the Appellant to satisfy the Board that the performance indicators for competencies 1 to 4 inclusive of a carpentry license had been met. Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1279
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Design 2, Site 1
- Decision date: 1 March 2017
-
Summary:
The Board found that Competencies 2, 3 and 4 for a Design area of practice (AOP 2) License had been met and the Board allowed the appeal. Appellant issued a Design AOP 2 Licence. Registrar’s decision reversed – Licence issued.
BPB appeal no. A1268
- Region: Auckland
- Licence class: Brick and Blocklaying
- Decision date: 15 December 2016
- Summary: The Board found that the Appellant did not meet a sufficient number of the performance indicators for a Brick and Blocklaying Licence. The Appellant was unable to demonstrate satisfactory knowledge of the relevant technical information, e.g. New Zealand Standards and manufacturers’ technical information – Appellant did not meet Competency (2, 3 and 4) –Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1269
- Region: Wellington
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 10 August 2016
- Summary: The Board found that the Appellant did not meet a sufficient number of the performance indicators for a Carpentry Licence. The Appellant was unable to demonstrate sufficient understanding and awareness of the regulatory processes that relate to licensing – Appellant did not meet Competency (1) – Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1266
- Region: Canterbury
- Licence class: Carpentry
- Decision date: 10 June 2016
- Summary: Appellant demonstrated that he had carried out a range of residential building work, but he was unable to satisfy the Board that he met a sufficient number of the Performance Indicators to be licensed – Appellant did not meet Competencies (1, 2, 3 and 4) – Registrar’s decision confirmed – Licence denied.
BPB appeal no. A1267
- Region: Omitted
- Licence class: Site 1
- Decision date: 10 June 2016
- Summary: In his submission the Appellant was able to demonstrate that he met the requirements of Competencies 2, 3, 4, and 5 for a Site 1 Licence – Registrar’s decision Reversed - Licence issued.