- Complaint number: C2-01101
- Region: Omitted
-
Licence class:
Carpentry
- Decision date: 14 July 2015
-
Disciplinary grounds:
317(1) d Work not compliant with building consent
317(1) da Failed to supply certificate / record of work
317(1) c Not licensed for class of work - not upheld
317(1) da Failed to supply certificate / record of work - not upheld
317(1) i Conduct likely to bring the regime into disrepute - not upheld
-
Summary:
317(1)(c) Not licensed for class of work – 317(1)(d) Work not compliant with building consent – commenced work without building consent - 317(1)(da) Failed to supply record of work – withheld the issuing of the Record of Work as a result of a dispute over payment – 317(1)(db) Purported to be licensed in class not held – advertised himself as an architect - 317(1)(i) Conduct likely to bring the regime into disrepute – complainant thought the respondent was a registered master builder – long delays - 317(1)(c) not upheld - 317(1)(d) upheld - 317(1)(da)(i) not upheld - 317(1)(da)(ii) upheld - 317(1)(db) not upheld - 317(1)(i) not upheld.
Download full report
PDF (517 KB)
